1/17/2020 Rubric Detail – Spring 2020 – Organ Leader & Decision …

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_786614_1&course_i… 1/3

Rubric Detail A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Novice Competent Pro�cient

Focus 0 (0.00%) Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the assignment Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements.

1 (10.00%) Establishes a good comprehension of topic. Student demonstrates an e�ective presentation of assignment, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.

2 (20.00%) Student exhibits a de�ned and clear understanding of the assignment. Student builds upon the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, �gures, and/or statements.

Content/Subject Knowledge

0 (0.00%) Student tries to explain some

t b t

1 (10.00%) Student exhibits above average

f bj t

2 (20.00%) Student demonstrates

� i t

Name: Graduate Course Rubric

Description: All asssignments will be graded according to this rubric. Exit

Grid View List View

1/17/2020 Rubric Detail – Spring 2020 – Organ Leader & Decision …

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_786614_1&course_i… 2/3

Novice Competent Pro�cient concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.

usage of subject matter in assignment. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.

pro�cient command of the subject matter in the assignment.. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.

Critical Thinking Skills

0 (0.00%) Student demonstrates beginning understanding of key concepts, but overlooks critical details. Learner is unable to apply information in a problem-solving fashion. Student presents confusing statements and facts in assignment. No evidence or little semblance of critical thinking skills.

1 (10.00%) Student exhibits a good command of critical thinking skills in the presentation of material and supporting statements. Assignment demonstrates the student’s above average use of relating concepts by using a variety of factors. Overall, student provides adequate conclusions, with 2 or fewer errors.

2 (20.00%) Student demonstrates a higher-level of critical thinking. Learner provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions which are not immediately obvious. Student presents a genuine intellectual development of ideas throughout assignment.

Organization of Ideas/Format

0 (0.00%) Assignment reveals formatting errors

d l k f

1 (10.00%) Student explains the majority of

i t d t

2 (20.00%) Student thoroughly understands and

l i l i i

1/17/2020 Rubric Detail – Spring 2020 – Organ Leader & Decision …

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_786614_1&course_i… 3/3

Novice Competent Pro�cient and a lack of organization. . The lack of appropriate references or source materials demonstrates the student’s need for additional help or training in this area. Student needs to review and revise the assignment.

points and concepts in the assignment. Student presents an above average level of preparedness, with a few formatting errors. Assignment contains less than 5 resources.

excels in explaining all major points. An original, unique, and/or imaginative approach to overall ideas, concepts, and �ndings is presented. Finished assignment demonstrates student’s ability to plan and organize research in a logical sequence. Student uses at least of 5-7 references in assignment.

Grammar and Mechanics

0 (0.00%) Topics, concepts, and ideas are not coherently discussed or expressed in assignments. Student’s writing style is weak and needs improvement, along with numerous proofreading errors. Assignment lacks clarity, consistency, and correctness. Student needs to review and revise assignment.

1 (10.00%) Student provides an e�ective display of good writing and grammar. Assignment appears to be well written with no more than 3-5 errors. Student provides a �nal written product that covers the above- minimal requirements.

2 (20.00%) Student demonstrates an excellent command of grammar, as well as presents research in a clear and concise writing style. Student excels in the selection and development of a well-planned research assignment. Assignment is error- free and re�ects student’s ability to prepare a high- quality academic assignment.

Name:Graduate Course Rubric

Description:All asssignments will be graded according to this rubric. Exit