Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages
Draft of Establish Goal-Related Tasks and Prioritize Goals and Tasks
In any organization, there are inevitable conflicts when workers of different backgrounds meet in a workplace. It can be expressed in different ways, such as bullying, insults, noncooperation, and anger. My role as a manager in the company is to handle workplace conflicts and communicate the company resolution procedures, as discussed below.
As a human resource manager, hiring and recruiting new staff is vital in my company in that new hire staff are energetic and can perform the assigned task on time. The features required to have a new officer in my company includes, would be motivating so that it keeps them going, reliability to build trust, respect to ensure they treat others the way they would like to be treated, and working skills and communication so that they can work well with others. As a manager, an assessment that I could implement to make sure that my new workers have the qualities I gain would be an escape room. An escape room may educate a team of new staff to stay alert to get out, respect the other teammates if one applies different skills which they know and how they can work together and communicate effectively to make it out united.
Some of the elements to improve the integrity of the organization include training of workers to help them gain more knowledge and skills which they can use in their daily work. As a supervisor, I would use the most experienced workers to impart the right skills, along with volunteers from other agencies (Shany, 2012). I will make sure that all new staff gets the proper training by exposing them through a make-believe stimulation so that they can use their skills and knowledge. These elements are important in that it makes ensure employees do work as assigned and avoid conflicts within the organization.
As a manager, I will create time with my employees to interact to make them air out their grievances, and to feel free in expressing themselves. Secondly, plan what I will do in the evening since it is the best time to reflect what I have done for the work to accomplish. I will also create themes so that I can work more efficiently on them like, focusing on accomplishing work at a time. I will schedule the most important work for reflecting on my progress and also determine if I can adjust or continue with the work. The performance and evaluation in addressing disciplinary and accountability issues in my organization are of great essence in that it gives a chance to have a direct conversation with every employee to give my all attention so that we can work on weaknesses and praise strengths ( Leake & Ram, 1995). On these, I find it good because it goes in a respectful way such that it allows the employee to feel contented by trusting me and opening up.
Internal inputs that I will take include, creating an environment whereby corrosive conflicts are not likely to occur and also a framework to minimize conflicts. A good culture created and building strong relationships between the employees and managers is vital based on mutual respect, fairness, and trust. These encourage and motivate them to work and produce the best results. Involving the community in written rules, agreements, and policies makes them understand how conflicts are resolved, and it will be easy to solve any emerging conflict.
Leake, D. B., & Ram, A. (1995). Learning, goals, and learning goals: a perspective on goal-driven learning. Artificial Intelligence Review, 9(6), 387-422.
Shany, Y. (2012). Assessing the effectiveness of international courts: a goal-based approach. American Journal of International Law, 106(2), 225-270.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH USA ELITE WRITERS TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT